General Overview


Logo

This report is the result of the use of the Python 3.4 package Sympy (for symbolic mathematics), as means to translate published models to a common language. It was created by Verónika Ceballos-Núñez (Orcid ID: 0000-0002-0046-1160) on 27/1/2016, and was last modified on lm.

About the model

The model depicted in this document considers carbon allocation with a process based approach. It was originally described by Comins & McMurtrie (1993).

Abstract

Established process-based models of forest biomass production in relation to atmospheric CO\(_2\) concentration (McMurtrie 1991) and soil carbon/nutrient dynamics (Parton et al. 1987) are integrated to derive the "Generic Decomposition and Yield" model (G'DAY). The model is used to describe how photosynthesis and nutritional factors interact to determine the productivity of forests growing under nitrogen-limited conditions. A simulated instantaneous doubling of atmospheric CO\(_2\) concentration leads to a growth response that is initially large (27% above productivity at current CO\(_2\)) but declines to <10% elevation within 5 yr. The decline occurs because increases in photosynthetic carbon gain at elevated CO\(_2\) are not matched by increases in nutrient supply. Lower foliar N concentrations at elevated CO\(_2\) have two countervailing effects on forest production: decreased rates of N cycling between vegetation and soils (with negative consequences for productivity), and reduced rates of N loss through gaseous emission, fire, and leaching. Theoretical analysis reveals that there is an enduring response to CO\(_2\) enrichment, but that the magnitude of the long-term equilibrium response is extremely sensitive to the assumed rate of gaseous emission resulting from mineralization of nitrogen. Theory developed to analyze G'DAY is applicable to other published production-decomposition models describing the partitioning of soil carbon among compartments with widely differing decay-time constants.

Space Scale

global

State Variables

The following table contains the available information regarding this section:

Information on State Variables
Name Description Units
\(F\) Foliage carbon content per unit ground area at equilibrium \(Mg/ha\)
\(R\) Root carbon \(Mg/ha\)
\(W\) Carbon in woody tissue \(Mg/ha\)

Photosynthetic Parameters

The following table contains the available information regarding this section:

Information on Photosynthetic Parameters
Name Description Type Units
\(G\) Net rate of plant carbon production variable \(Mg\cdot ha^{-1}\cdot yr^{-1}\)

Partitioning coefficients

The following table contains the available information regarding this section:

Information on Partitioning coefficients
Name Description Type
\(\eta_{f}\) Allocation fraction to foliar biomass parameter
\(\eta_{r}\) Allocation fraction to roots biomass parameter
\(\eta_{w}\) Allocation fraction to wood (in stem, branches and large structurl roots) biomass parameter

Cycling Rates

The following table contains the available information regarding this section:

Information on Cycling Rates
Name Description Type Units
\(\gamma_{f}\) Foliage senescence rate parameter \(yr^{-1}\)
\(\gamma_{r}\) Roots senescence rate parameter \(yr^{-1}\)
\(\gamma_{w}\) Wood senescence rate parameter \(yr^{-1}\)

Components

The following table contains the available information regarding this section:

Information on Components
Name Description Expressions
\(x\) vector of states for vegetation \(x=\left[\begin{matrix}F\\R\\W\end{matrix}\right]\)
\(u\) scalar function of photosynthetic inputs \(u=G\)
\(b\) vector of partitioning coefficients of photosynthetically fixed carbon \(b=\left[\begin{matrix}\eta_{f}\\\eta_{r}\\\eta_{w}\end{matrix}\right]\)
\(A\) matrix of senescence (cycling) rates \(A=\left[\begin{matrix}-\gamma_{f} & 0 & 0\\0 & -\gamma_{r} & 0\\0 & 0 & -\gamma_{w}\end{matrix}\right]\)
\(f_{v}\) the righthandside of the ode \(f_{v}=u\,b+A\,x\)

Pool model representation

Flux description

Figure 1
Figure 1: Pool model representation

Input fluxes

\(F: G\cdot\eta_{f}\)
\(R: G\cdot\eta_{r}\)
\(W: G\cdot\eta_{w}\)

Output fluxes

\(F: F\cdot\gamma_{f}\)
\(R: R\cdot\gamma_{r}\)
\(W: W\cdot\gamma_{w}\)

The right hand side of the ODE

\(\left[\begin{matrix}- F\cdot\gamma_{f} + G\cdot\eta_{f}\\G\cdot\eta_{r} - R\cdot\gamma_{r}\\G\cdot\eta_{w} - W\cdot\gamma_{w}\end{matrix}\right]\)

The Jacobian (derivative of the ODE w.r.t. state variables)

\(\left[\begin{matrix}-\gamma_{f} & 0 & 0\\0 & -\gamma_{r} & 0\\0 & 0 & -\gamma_{w}\end{matrix}\right]\)

Steady state formulas

\(F = \frac{G}{\gamma_{f}}\cdot\eta_{f}\)
\(R = \frac{G}{\gamma_{r}}\cdot\eta_{r}\)
\(W = \frac{G}{\gamma_{w}}\cdot\eta_{w}\)

References

Comins, H. N., & McMurtrie, R. E. (1993). Long-term response of nutrient-limited forests to CO\(_2\) enrichment; equilibrium behavior of plant-soil models. Ecological Applications, 3(4), 666–681.